Question Constellation Sign up for free

AQA · GCSE · Chemistry · Higher

Bicycle frame material evaluation

Q06.1 6 marks

Table 3 shows information about two materials used to make bicycle frames.

Table 3
Aluminium alloyBamboo
Raw materialaluminium orebamboo plant
Cost of frame in £2501500
Strength in arbitrary units290193
Mass in kilograms1.62.4
Lifespan in years6–1010–15
One method of disposal at end of liferecycled to make new productsburned to produce heat energy

Evaluate the use of aluminium alloy and of bamboo for making bicycle frames. Use Table 3.

Write your answer first. You can study the marking guidance whenever you need it.

Study the marking See what earns credit and compare it with a full-mark answer.

Marking points

  1. 1 Uses a sufficient range of relevant comparisons from Table 3 and/or the official life-cycle implications, considering both aluminium alloy and bamboo.
  2. 2 Logically links material properties or life-cycle data to consequences for a bicycle frame or the environment.
  3. 3 Gives a reasoned overall judgement that is supported by the comparison for the highest level.

Full-mark answer

Aluminium alloy is cheaper (£250 rather than £1500), stronger (290 rather than 193 units) and lighter (1.6 kg rather than 2.4 kg), so it should withstand larger forces and make the bicycle easier to carry. However, aluminium ore is finite and mining it is polluting. Its 6–10 year lifespan is shorter, although the frame can be recycled to conserve ore. Bamboo is renewable and lasts 10–15 years, and at the end of its life it can provide renewable heat energy. However, growing it uses agricultural land, and the frame is more expensive, weaker and heavier. Overall, aluminium alloy is the better choice where cost, strength and low mass are most important, provided it is recycled, while bamboo has advantages in renewability and lifespan.

Why this answer loses marks

Aluminium alloy is best because it is stronger.

This uses only one advantage, says nothing about bamboo or wider criteria, and does not weigh the trade-offs before judging.